MSME Award Appeal here we mean and discuss Appeal against the order, decree or Award arising out of the statutory arbitration proceeding under MSME Act. There have been challenges to this provision in courts, where the contentions were raised that this provision is not mandatory and there can be deviation by the Appellate court. Thus, the Supreme Court has made it clear that the provision of section 19 of the MSME Act is mandatory in nature..             
mail@nbassociates.net
9811899279

Sec 498A – What is Section 498A of IPC


Author- admin
Date:April 4, 2023

Sec 498A – What is Section 498A of IPC?

Law notes by NB Associates

Introduction – Section 498A

Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) is a provision in criminal law that deals with cruelty by a husband or his relatives against a married woman.

This section was introduced in 1983 to provide legal protection to married women who are subjected to cruelty and harassment by their husbands or their relatives.

The section has been controversial, with some people claiming that it is misused by women to falsely implicate their husbands and their relatives. However, the provision has been upheld by the courts as a necessary measure to protect women from domestic violence and harassment.

History and Background of Section 498A

Before the introduction of Section 498A, there were no specific provisions in the Indian Penal Code to deal with the problem of domestic violence and cruelty against women. Women who were victims of domestic violence had to rely on general provisions such as assault and hurt to seek legal recourse. These provisions, however, were not adequate to address the specific nature of domestic violence, which is often perpetrated in a sustained and systematic manner and involves physical, sexual, and emotional abuse.

In 1983, the Indian government introduced the Dowry Prohibition Act, which made the giving and taking of dowry a criminal offence. The Act, however, did not address the problem of domestic violence and harassment of women by their husbands and in-laws. To fill this gap, the government introduced Section 498A in the IPC, which specifically deals with cruelty against married women.

Provisions of Section 498A

Under Section 498A, any husband or his relative who subjects a married woman to cruelty is liable to be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend up to three years and also be fined.

Cruelty, in this context, includes any wilful conduct which is likely to drive a woman to commit suicide or to cause grave injury or danger to her life, limb or health (whether mental or physical) or harassment with a view to coercing her or any person related to her to meet any unlawful demand for any property or valuable security or is on account of failure by her or any person related to her to meet such demand.

The section applies to both physical and mental cruelty. Physical cruelty includes any act of violence such as beating, kicking, or burning. Mental cruelty includes verbal abuse, insults, harassment, and intimidation. The section also applies to cruelty by in-laws, including the husband’s father, mother, brother, sister, and any other relative.

The section also provides for the arrest of the accused without a warrant, in cases where the police officer has reason to believe that the accused has committed an offence punishable under this section. This provision has been criticized for being open to abuse, with some people claiming that it has led to the arrest of innocent people.

Criticism of Section 498A

Section 498A has been criticized by some who claim that it is misused by women to falsely implicate their husbands and their relatives. Critics argue that the provision is biased against men and that it leads to the harassment of innocent people. Some also argue that the provision is being misused by women to extract money from their husbands in divorce settlements.

The misuse of Section 498A has been documented in several cases, where women have filed false cases of domestic violence against their husbands and in-laws to settle personal scores or to extract money. In some cases, the women have been found to have filed false cases even after the accused have paid large sums of money as a settlement.

The Supreme Court of India has also acknowledged the problem of misuse of Section 498A. In 2017, the court passed a judgment directing the police to follow certain guidelines to prevent the misuse of the provision. The court also observed that many cases filed under Section 498A are frivolous and have no basis in fact.

The criticism of Section 498A is not without its flaws and there have been instances of its misuse. However, it is important to note that the provision is a necessary measure to protect women from domestic violence and harassment. Domestic violence is a serious problem in India and affects women of all ages, classes, and castes.

Significance of section 498A

The provision has been instrumental in providing legal protection to women who are victims of domestic violence. The provision has led to a greater awareness of the problem of domestic violence and has encouraged women to come forward and seek legal recourse.

The provision has also had a deterrent effect on domestic violence. Men who are aware of the provision are less likely to engage in domestic violence, knowing that they could face serious consequences.

There have been efforts to amend Section 498A to address some of the concerns raised by its critics. The Law Commission of India has recommended that the provision should be made bailable and that the police should be required to conduct a preliminary inquiry before making any arrests.

Conclusion

Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code is a necessary provision to protect women from domestic violence and harassment.

The provision has been instrumental in providing legal protection to women who are victims of domestic violence. While there have been instances of its misuse, it is important to remember that the provision has had a positive impact on the lives of many women.

Efforts should be made to address the concerns raised by its critics while ensuring that the provision continues to serve its intended purpose.